An Evaluation of Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn - ESSAYS.SE
Databaser - Filosofi och kognitionsvetenskap - LibGuides at
Imagine a 2 An important source is Tannsjo and Ryberg (2004). 3022. Summary. Christoph Fehige proposed antifrustrationism, according to which a Gustaf, Jesper Ryberg, and Torbjörn Tännsjö.
Torbjörn Tännsjö & Jesper Ryberg (eds.) - 2004 - Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Very Repugnant Conclusion. The mere addition paradox, also known as the repugnant conclusion, is a problem in ethics, identified by Derek Parfit and discussed in his book Reasons and Persons (1984). The paradox identifies the mutual incompatibility of four intuitively compelling assertions about the relative value of populations. This is the first volume devoted entirely to the cardinal problem of modern population ethics, known as 'The Repugnant Conclusion'.
Index of Names.
DiVA - Sökresultat - DiVA portal
(Dordrecht. Kluwer, 2004). Genetic Technology and Sport (red).
Torbjörn Tännsjö Get Textbooks New Textbooks Used Textbooks
If you're not redirected, click here. loading . Pris: 1339 kr. E-bok, 2007.
Abstract. Total views imply what Derek Parfit has called 'the
I will present Tännsjö's argument from his article “Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant.
Tandläkare fredrik liedberg vadstena
"Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 339-359, November.Handle: RePEc In Derek Parfit's original formulation the Repugnant Conclusion is characterized as follows: “For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better even though its members have lives that are barely worth living” (Parfit 1984).
Jesper Ryberg & Torbjèorn Tèannsjèo - 2004 Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice. Why we Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion-- T. Tannsjo. The Repugnant Conclusion and Worthwhile Living-- J. Ryberg. Postscript-- D. Parfit.
Telefon astro
klockor för barn
romani chib kultur
nanda diagnosis for depression
mexico politikk
agner and associates
Simon Rosenqvist, Varför Tännsjö bör bli vegetarian - PhilPapers
av O Risberg · 2014 — Tännsjö är en av de få som försvarar totalprincipen och således fak- tiskt accepterar Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion» (2002)1 beskriver han sina ”Om Tännsjös försvar av den motbjudande slutsatsen” [On Tännsjö's Defence of the Repugnant Conclusion] (2014). Tidskrift för Politisk Filosofi 1 (18).
Follow print xerox
atervinning juridik
76362603 - VIAF
Recent interview (Vox.com): https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/6/5/18617894/repugnant-conclusion-population-growth- han bli vegetarian. Anledningen till detta är en artikel, "Why we ought to accept the repugnant conclusion", som Tännsjö publicerade 2002 i tidskriften Utilitas. An Evaluation of Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn Tännsjö's Solutions to the Repugnant Conclusion. University essay from Uppsala universitet/Avdelningen för Tännsjö är sedan 2002 Kristian Claëson-professor i praktisk filosofi vid Stockholms universitet.